His face.. or well just his entire head in general.
Those lips..
Pretty sure when he talks to girls, this is all we ever hear. "But there is no sound", you're thinking. Exactly. |
..how pouty they get when he uses them
I hear sound effects in my head when I watch this. A voice moaning. A voice eerily similar to mine. Wait, that wasn't in my head. |
The perfect manly facial hair..
"Nah babe, I just woke up." "Uh, yeah, me too!" *checks if false lashes are appropriately placed* |
..and the angelic facial shape it enhances:
Did you say you were a straight man/lesbian? Are you really sure of that? |
OK, so in case it isn't obvious thus far, the case I am making is that Kellan's face is flawless. I felt it would be better illustrated by just posting pictures first, so you can realize that even if you thought you knew how insanely gorgeous he is, you had no idea. If you're a regular reader of my blog (in which case "thank you, you're awesome" is in order), you will know that I have a huge crush on the brothers Hemsworth. I think they are insanely gorgeous, but they each have something that the other lacks, which makes it hard to decide who's the hotter brother. Kellan, however, lacks nothing. He has it all, and he is light years ahead of the Hemsworths because of it. He's got the sexy look in his eyes, but they are also kind and loving. He's got that boyish grin, that's sexy, inviting, and warm. He's got the lips of an angel, and a facial structure that looks like it's been cut by angels. And his face is only the beginning! Let's move further south..
Upper body (he's not Hercules for nothing!)
There are men with nice bodies, and then there are men with bodies extraordinary enough to play demigods in movies. Guess which one Kellan is? Hint:
I hope they show this movie in HD at the cinema.. and that they have private booths. |
Need another?
You don't see chests like these anymore! |
Doesn't he just look.. strong? I can't wait to see the movie "The Legend of Hercules"! He could be carrying a mountain and I'd look at his physique and think "yeah, seems legit!" His upper body isn't the only "big" part of him however..
His lower body wants in as well
..and who are we to refuse?
When you see it, you will shit bricks. |
Holy. Shit. In case you're extraordinarily slow, here's a close up:
Shitting bricks now? |
I repeat: Holy. Shit. I've been staring at this for 10 minutes now trying to think of something clever to say. I just can't. It's holy. There will be no jokes. Only love and respect.. and awe. Oh, and lucid dreaming. Need to learn that right about now.
You may be thinking "that's photoshopped!". Well..
This is backstage photos, not official photos, and I must say he's looking very.. full. |
Still sceptical? You're probably a man, then.
But it's not just his intense, perfect beyond perfection, godlike, carved by angels appearance that makes him so appealing. There are many other things, like..
He does charity work
Like visits sick children
Fights for animal rights
Helps rebuild damaged homes
These are the things that make me respect him as a human being, and quite frankly have left me with a bad taste in my mouth over the physical parts of this blog post. Yes, he is beautiful, but here's this wonderful, intelligent, warm, and caring guy, who spends his free time helping others, and all we can talk about is his appearance. It is rare for objectification to reach these levels for men, but for women it's not. There are plenty of women out there who are the equivalent of Kellan in appearance (OK, so not plenty, but some.. like a 2004'ish Angelina Jolie, for example), and who are judged solely based on their appearance. When they try to do good, it is only "to save face" in the eyes of the public, because we all know they're too busy feuding with other famous women, or being sluts and home wreckers. When a man does it, we blindly accept it for what it is - charity work. Volunteer work. Work they choose to do to help others. How many people are still saying Angelina Jolie's work with refugees is just to "better her image"? I realize the way to combat female objectification is not to objectify men, and I'm sorry Kellan (in the unlikely even that you'll ever see this) that you were the subject chosen for this, but I just wanted to portray the creepily thorough analysis women are put through on a man. There is one difference though: if this was a man looking at a woman, instead of a woman looking at a man, there would probably be a lot of references to things that aren't "perfect" and areas that could (and should) be "improved", in addition to comparing her to other women who actually do meet these standards, and hence are more worthy. Why is this OK?
If you enjoyed this post, please like it and share it with your friends. If you want to receive updates about when I post new blog posts right away, like my blog's Facebook page.
Yours,
Yours,
No comments:
Post a Comment