Genetic Gayness

When discussing homosexuality, so many people get hung up on one thing: is it biological or isn't it? While I understand the scientific interest in human sexuality, development of sexual orientation etc., in a social context I must ask this one question: why does it even matter? What does it matter if a person happens to be romantically and/or sexually attracted to the oppsite, same, or both sexes? A sexually mature person should be free to engage in consensual sex with whoever they please, regardless of gender. Even if it became evident that there were no biological indicators of homosexuality: what relevance would it have? People would still be gay, and that's fine! Actually, it's beyond fine: it's boring, and we shouldn't care. What gender people are attracted to is BORING. I find it intriguing when homophobic, anti-gay rights people use lack of evidence of biological factors as an excuse for their hate. "There is little to no evidence to support that homosexuality is biological. Therefore we should try to cure these people with conversion therapy [anyone that has done basic psychology courses would know that it has been proven to be completely ineffective, short of "testimonials"], refuse them basic human rights, and preferably expose them to ridicule, social stigma, and blame them for HIV". That is literally the argument. The most ironic thing is how homosexuality gets labeled as immoral by ministers who molest children, and conservative US senators that get caught with underaged prostitutes. For a fun insight into how that works, check out this link.